<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
 
 <title>wsper | an abstract SOA framework</title>
 <subtitle>SOA made simple</subtitle>
 <link href="http://www.wsper.org/wsper.xml" rel="self"/>
 <link href="http://www.wsper.org/"/>
 <updated>2007-11-03T01:30:02Z</updated>
 <author>
   <name>Jean-Jacques Dubray</name>
   <email>jdubray@gmail.com</email>
 </author>
 <id>urn:uuid:80b25e29-f059-29a0-a22C-9302901a1bd4</id>
 
 	   	<entry>
			<title>Atom Publishing Protocol 1.0 Metamodel published</title>
			<link href="http://www.wsper.org/app10.html" />
   <id>urn:uuid:1003a696-cfb2-4f39-0bca-83da344abe2a</id>
   <updated>2007-12-12T01:30:02Z</updated>
			<summary>

			<p>I have created a UML metamodel for APP 1.0 to help with REST discussions.</p>
		
			</summary>
		</entry>	 
 	   	<entry>
			<title>HTTP/1.1 Metamodel published</title>
			<link href="http://www.wsper.org/http11.html" />
   <id>urn:uuid:1003a696-cfb2-4f39-0bca-82da344aba2a</id>
   <updated>2007-12-12T01:30:02Z</updated>
			<summary>

			<p>I have created a UML metamodel for HTTP/1.1 to help with REST discussions</p>
		
			</summary>
		</entry>	 

 	   	<entry>
			<title>WADL Metamodel published</title>
			<link href="http://www.wsper.org/wadl2006.html" />
   <id>urn:uuid:1a03e696-cfb2-4f3b-0bca-82da344a2a6a</id>
   <updated>2007-11-03T01:30:02Z</updated>
			<summary>

			<p>I have created a UML metamodel for WADL.</p>
		
			</summary>
		</entry>	 
	   	<entry>
			<title>SCA Assemblies for Web Services</title>
			<link href="http://www.ebpml.org/blog/19.htm" />
   <id>urn:uuid:1503e696-cfb8-4f3b-0bca-82da344a1a6a</id>
   <updated>2007-11-03T01:30:02Z</updated>
			<summary><p>
		I spoke for 5 minutes with David Chappell at the SOA and BPM conference 
		after his talk. I hate to be at odds with Dave because he takes pride, 
		rightfully so, to express himself with great precision. I am glad to see 
		that we both agree that assemblies are a critical piece of SOA -this 
		means that Microsoft will add them somehow. The point of disagreement 
		comes from the fact that Dave says that after reading the spec and 
		talking with different SCA authors it is clear that SCA domains cannot 
		span multiple vendor implementations. I think we are disagreeing on the 
		interpretation of this statement.</p>
		<p>
		In a pure Web Service assembly (including BPEL service implementations) 
		this constraint is artificial. Sure enough, one vendor infrastructure 
		should be in charge of &quot;deploying&quot; the assembly definition to the 
		different participants but requiring that all web services run in the 
		same container is contrary to the most basic SOA principles. </p>
		<p>
		I made the point to Dave that the only correlation mechanism you needed 
		to make an SCA assembly real was the ability for a service to expose 
		assembly specific endpoints which is very common in today's web service 
		containers. He seemed to be caught off guard by this remark.</p>
		<p>
		Stay tuned, I will show how (or how not) SCA supports the notion of Web 
		Service assemblies.</p>

			</summary>
		</entry>	 

 
  <entry>
   <title>BPEL4PEOPLE 1.0 Metamodel published</title>
   <link href="http://www.wsper.org/bpel4people10.html"/>
   <id>urn:uuid:1203e696-cfb8-4f3b-abaa-80da344efa6a</id>
   <updated>2007-10-19T01:30:02Z</updated>
   <summary>I published the first pass at BPEL4PEOPLE 1.0 metamodel including the links to BPEL 2.0</summary>
 </entry>
<entry>
   <title>BPMN 1.0 Metamodel published</title>
   <link href="http://www.wsper.org/bpmn10.html"/>
   <id>urn:uuid:1001c696-cfb8-4f3b-aaaa-80da344efa6a</id>
   <updated>2007-10-19T01:30:02Z</updated>
   <summary>I published the first pass at BPMN 1.0 metamodel. The mapping to BPEL will be treated separately</summary>
 </entry>
	   	<entry>
			<title>Setting out for SCA</title>
			<link href="http://www.infoq.com/news/2007/10/setting-out-for-sca" />
			<id>urn:uuid:1001c695-cfb8-4ebb-aaaa-80db344efb6b</id>
   			<summary>Henning Blohm, Java EE Software Architect at SAP and Co-Chair of the SCA-J Technical Committee provides his perspective on SCA as a cross-technology programming model integration. He claims that for vendors SCA lowers the marginal costs of providing implementation or binding technology and for users it reduces the marginal costs of using them.</summary>
			<updated>2007-10-18T01:30:02Z</updated>
		</entry>	 

 <entry>
   <title>WS-BPEL 2.0 metamodel published</title>
   <link href="http://www.wsper.org/ws-bpel20.html"/>
   <id>urn:uuid:1001c695-cfb8-4ebb-aaaa-80da344efa6a</id>
   <updated>2007-09-29T01:30:02Z</updated>
   <summary>I published the first pass at WS-BPEL 2.0 metamodel. The attributes of activities are hidden to keep the diagram readable.</summary>
 </entry>
 
</feed>
